You might be saying, in which case lucky you. I would like today's Intro to be a long post about a podcast I heard earlier this week, which I have had time to fulminate upon, and which you are going to get the benefit of, like it or not. SIT BACK DOWN!
Okay, its a Boll Weevil, not Evil Boll. But close enough. |
So, on the 20th we had a list of the 5 Best and Worst Sci-Fi film directors, which came up with interesting choices. The hacks chosen were taken from scored lists chosen by a panel, not simply selected from a Post-It list each critic threw at the ceiling and successfully impaled there with a nail-gun.
Here's the list, in reverse order:
WORST BEST
Roland Emmerich Nicholas Meyer
George Lucas James Cameron
Luc Besson Stephen Speilberg
Uwe Boll George Lucas
Michael Bay Stanley Kubrick
For me in the "Worst" they could have added Joel Schumacher, as the man is an artless hack living for the paycheck. No arguments about the Best, although mine would have included John Carpenter (although the reason he's not there is that he's seen primarily as a Horror director). No quibbles about Big Stan being Number One.
The reason you see Georgie Boy in both is because he is revered for the first three Star Wars films, then reviled for the next three. Swings and roundabouts.
We'll come back to this list, don't worry. Conrad cannot resist lambasting a recumbent equine quadruped.
What he said |
Ah, Hello Coincidence Hydra - AGAIN
Well well well, yes indeed, it's been a few days since this hideous creature has troubled us. I say "us" when it's my behind it consistently tackles, so I hope you feel grateful that I'm taking another one for the team.
What was I blathering on about earlier this afternoon? Why, the hideous borderline-poisonous plant extracts present in a soft drink. Wormwood and snakerot and frothing scorpion venom, and also blackthorn -
Zounds! |
Back To The Best
I refer you to Number 5 on the Best list, Nicholas Meyer. He became highly regarded as a non-genre director who nevertheless got to grips with sci-fi and who "got it". End result are all the Star Trek films that don't suck - II, IV and VI.
Now, how I reached the next bit escapes me - blame Oscar and Steve - but I found myself watching the attack scenes in "The Day After" and who is the director?
None other than Nick Meyer (at this point I ran screaming from the room).
Yes, the very same chap, making a television movie about a thermonuclear attack on Lawrence, Kansas. There is also a version with his commentary added, which is very illuminating. He observes that the US armed forces would not touch the film with a 12 yard Bangalore Torpedo, so all the apparent military kit is pretend, and the film mixes in stock footage to look even more convincing.
He had to run the film past a television move convention called "Standards and Practices" which he stated, flatly, was censorship under another name; it persuaded him never to make another TV movie. Oh well.
Some of the effects haven't worn well, but the ghastly images of ICBMs destroying Kansas City, looking like evil bloated jellyfish, still have a power to them. Art?
Done by injecting oil into transparent tanks |
After that grimfest, I think we need a little jollifier.
A Little Positive Balance
You may be aware that there is a gigantic backlog of traffic at Dover as UK residents desperately attempt to flee the impending zombie apocalypse, or go on their holidays*. They are going to be stuck there until 2017, apparently. Imagine all those people sitting overheating in their cars, when a polite Sikh chap rocks up at your window offering free bottles of water and cereal bars. Art?
That's Khalsa Aid. Normally they deal with disaster relief here and abroad; a minor humanitarian gesture today that proves not all Hom. Sap. are incorrigible rascals.
* I know which I'd prefer!
No comments:
Post a Comment