Yet at one time, we loved the atom. Nuclear fission was going to provide endless energy so cheap it would be practically free, which is a word that always goes down well. Nuclear-powered aircraft and trains and cars would free the Western world from relying on oil for fuel (sorry, Texas). Nuclear medicine would provide new insights and miraculously heal the sick.
Eat my radioactive exhaust fumes, slowpokes! |
Now, cast your minds back to 1949. At this point Sputnik, jet fighters, ICBMs and train-mobile missiles were pipedreams; what you had was the technology of the Second Unpleasantness jazzed-up a bit. Your problem is: how do you lob a 15 kiloton warhead with a high degree of accuracy, out to 20 miles?
No! Not freight-carrying eagles. Really, Art. |
A REALLY BIG GUN! |
It had a really cool double-tractor arrangement that looks straight out of futurologist Gerry Anderson's stable of kit, which we can prod Art into illustrating -
Wikipedia, incidentally, is wrong about these futuristic-looking beasts, which were not obsolete even as they went into service. For one thing, nuclear artillery rounds for existing guns did not arrive until 1963, and the Honest John nuclear battlefield missile was miserably inaccurate until re-jigged in the Sixties.
No article on an nuclear artillery would be complete without a picture of the test round being fired. Art?
Quiver in fear, Djugashvili!** |
Drashigs. CAUTION! Not suitable as domestic pets.*** |
As you know, Conrad's miserable existence is only brightened by you, his audience, reading his daily scrivelling rants and tants and thus increasing his traffic figures. However, if all else fails I can fall back on the reassurance that there are at least two devoted afficionadoes thirsting for more BOOJUM!
I know you wouldn't accept this assertion without evidence, so here it is. Art?
I rest my case. I also rest my typing, as it's time to go get some lunch.
A Match Made In -
If not Heaven, then perhaps the Elysian Fields?
I am talking, of course, about those fictional detectives John May and Arthur Bryant, as created by Christopher Fowler, and whose numerous book titles inevitably begin "Bryant and May -" which works as a marketing ploy since I picked one off the shelves at Royton Library Lo! those many years ago. Art?
Do you see what - O you do. |
My current perusal. Get it? "Tide" - "Current" - oh I'm wasted here, wasted. |
That's not what I meant to say. The thing is, you see, I've bought various copies over the years, and taken copies out from the library, but I cannot remember which ones nor the sequence I read them in, as opposed to the sequence they ought to be read in, and there's a shelfload of them. Feel my pain.
May and Bryant (and Janice) |
- no, no, that was my film treatment the Sci-Fi Channel rejected, wasn't it? "Too prosaic and mundane"" they said. Ha! As if. We all know they're too cheap to want to animate CGI weasel fur, the pikers.
It can be done, you know. |
Martian Meandering
I see that the European Space Agency - and yes, there really is such a thing and long has been - is now pondering a couple of weighty matters. To wit: where to land their ExoMars robotic rover, as they now have two choices of location when their small robotic child nears the end of it's approach to Mars.
The Rover, powered-down |
The Exo-Mars Battle Bot deployed |
A bit fuzzy but you get the idea. |
Erk. |
* This may not be entirely accurate.
** Stalin's real name. A little harder to pronounce and spell, nicht war?
*** Also, descended from KILLER EELS!
No comments:
Post a Comment