I know this is bordering on near-Continental levels of manic hysteria, but I have my reasons. Last night I began typing out today's blog, and got a couple of hundred words down. This morning, before leaving to catch the bus I added in a picture from the Bookbub page "51 Greatest Science Fiction Novels" (it won't load at work) and when I actually arrive at work and sit down to type stuff out, what do I get?
THE FRIKKIN' REFORMATTING CURSOR MALFUNCTION!! Every time I move the cursor it reformats the text, until the page looks like an explosion in a font factory. Thus I am having to type this out from scratch and so long all the prep work <sighs deeply>.
As I would have begun -
Of Course I AM Clever But A Little Backup Doesn't Hurt
Or even a lot of backup.
Or any backup.
For Lo! we are talking about the intellectual development of the kids of today, and specifically one of my smaller relatives, that being Ella, whom at 12 is
Sorry for the sheer scale, I can't reduce it down handily.
So, can any of you out there solve the latter three problems? It took me a minute or two, but I managed, and then sat back feeling rather smug. Hint: you are looking for patterns, which are NOT necessarily mathematical solutions.
As I mentioned when replying with the solutions, this is the sort of thing that people over at GCHQ do: look for patterns, repetitions, uniques, sequences, all that sort of thing, which is why Bletchley Park recruited crossword compilers*.
Okay, motley, how fast do you think you're going to go when I light that rocket strapped to your skateboard**?
Colin Furze, we need you now! |
I know, I know, it irritates the grit out of the literati, who insist that it ought to be "speculative fiction", which is why I do it <snickers evilly>.
Anyway, from what I remember when adding in the detail this morning, the next volume on the list is "1984" by George Orwell (a.k.a. Eric Arthur Blair), which, if we can get a cover illustration thanks to Art -
Thus |
SPOILERSPOILERSPOILERSPOILERSPOILERSPOILERSPOILERSPOILERSPOILERSPOILERSPOILE
Plus, there is no happy ending. O noes. The protagonist - we cannot call him a "hero" by any stretch of the imagination - ends up a broken, subservient drone after undergoing everything he is mortally scared of in Room 101. Pundits today love to draw comparisons with contemporary society and how we are already living in the hell of 1984 blah blah blah -
Yes, but we have Netflix.
Or - are you watching him? |
An Unholy Mad Mutant Combination
If you know anything about aerial warfare, then you will be aware of the Spitfire, an aircraft so curvy it's pervy, and which looks fast standing still <rambles on about the Battle of Britain for a couple of hours> and the counterpart to the Spitfire would be the Messerschmidt 109, which had a more brutalist look to it, and which was dangerous for beginners.
One of these things is not like the other
It just so happens that an RAF pilot landed on what he thought was the Isle of Wight in 1942, except it turned out to be Teuton-occupied Jersey. They fell on his Spitfire with great delight, and sent it to Germany, where they replaced the nose and engine with that from an Me 109, producing a "Messerspit". I bet they were patting themselves on the back over that one. Art?
The beast in question |
More Matania
Yes, the forte of Ol' Fortunino, to wit: painting scenes from the First Unpleasantness. He was an officially-accredited war correspondent, you know, and attended at first hand in France and Flanders.
Here an aside. That "An Englishman At War", which is the war diaries of Colonel Stanley Christopherson, that never arrived, is chokingly expensive on Abebooks; some chiselers in South Canada want £360 pounds for a copy. A used copy.
Where were we? O yes -
Thus |
There you go, now you know more than you did five minutes ago.
Finally -
As you ought to know by now, BOOJUM! likes to occasionally feature an unusual ship, because normal is boring. Art?
Behold the boat |
The original, with puny humans for scale |
* You know, Station X, Enigma, bombes, Alan Turing and all that jazz.
** This is experimentation, not cruelty, so it's allowed.
No comments:
Post a Comment