I've been after this one for a while (See photograph below).
It's not new, as it got published in 2004, yet the premise intrigued me - perhaps that should be capitalised - The Premise Intrigued Me - as it looks to be one of a relatively new field of revisionist histories that challenge the old shibboleths about how rubbish the British - and Canuckistanian - armour was in Normandy of '44 vintage. Yes, more about the Second Unpleasantness, but console yourself with the thought that at least I'm not banging on about "Where Eagles Dare" yet again.
It's not new, as it got published in 2004, yet the premise intrigued me - perhaps that should be capitalised - The Premise Intrigued Me - as it looks to be one of a relatively new field of revisionist histories that challenge the old shibboleths about how rubbish the British - and Canuckistanian - armour was in Normandy of '44 vintage. Yes, more about the Second Unpleasantness, but console yourself with the thought that at least I'm not banging on about "Where Eagles Dare" yet again.
That's PROFESSOR John Buckley to you |
Here an aside and a confession. I did have a dodgy, <coughcough>te version of this as a PDF on my old laptop, which I must have started to read at least three times, before giving up. Books are meant to be held in the hand and have their pages turned, not exist as an electronic ghost*.
Anyway, John's assertion is that the criticism of British - and Can - look, just take it as read that we include the Canuckistanians and Poles in that title, okay? - of British armour is that it has been badly served by critics who usually concentrate on only 3 armoured divisions in Normandy - the Guards, 7th and 11th. There are two other armoured divisions that appear to be ignored, the Polish Armoured Division and the 79th Armoured, which is a special case. Not only that, there were eight independent armoured brigades, each of which had 3 regiments of tanks, which the old carping critics also seem to have a blind spot about: odd, since that's scads of tanks.
Doubtless I shall be sharing my insights with you in the near future. How lucky are you!
I was going to go on about 79th Armoured Division; however, I think we've had enough TANK for today.
Anyway, John's assertion is that the criticism of British - and Can - look, just take it as read that we include the Canuckistanians and Poles in that title, okay? - of British armour is that it has been badly served by critics who usually concentrate on only 3 armoured divisions in Normandy - the Guards, 7th and 11th. There are two other armoured divisions that appear to be ignored, the Polish Armoured Division and the 79th Armoured, which is a special case. Not only that, there were eight independent armoured brigades, each of which had 3 regiments of tanks, which the old carping critics also seem to have a blind spot about: odd, since that's scads of tanks.
79th Armoured Division deploy world's largest toilet-roll |
I was going to go on about 79th Armoured Division; however, I think we've had enough TANK for today.
Hello Coincidence Hydra - AGAIN
What On Earth? I happened to be looking at my Twitter feed (get me I'm so hip and trendy) and I noticed that Professor Gary Sheffield had responded to a dedication in Peter Caddick-Adams' "Sand and Steel", another volume I intend to get at some point in the middle future.
What was the dedication, I wondered?
I had to nosey as the Coincidence Hydra suddenly fastened it's teeth in my nethers again. Look below at the first line -
- And Again. Again.
Look, there'll be nothing left of my glutes at this rate. You will recall that yesteryon I was merrily informing you about the MP40, and even began the post with a wittering about magazines? You had better recall, I don't take kindly to people who ignore my words of wisdom.
What popped up on Youtube but an item from "Forgotten Weapons" about the Teuton attempt to compete with the Sinister's PPSH41.
Here a necessary aside. The "Pepesha", as the Ruffian soldiers dubbed it, was a pretty nifty sub-machine gun, which if Art -
PPSH41 |
This kind of firepower in the hands of Slavs worried the Nazis terribly, given their worldview, so they tried some expedients such as the double-magazine MP40.
Hmmm, I squeezed a lot out of a coincidence there, did I not?**
Life Imitating Life
You will recall, I hope, Conrad's recent exploration of criminal enterprises involving pyramid scams, and the usual process by which they come unstuck.
At the weekend I came across a BBC headline - sorry - That Intrigued Me, asking the question "Where Is Doctor Ruja"?
In hiding, is the answer |
I don't know what she claims to be a doctor of, doughnut dunking or sand-stacking, probably, though she was highly successful as a promoter of OneCoin, a virtual currency that was going to totally blow Bitcoin out of the water, be incredibly successful, make everyone rich and stop global warming. The Doctor toured the world signing people up, and making about £3 billion in the process. "Wow" said business experts. "OneCoin sounds too good to be true!" shortly followed by "It is too good to be true!" followed by "It's a total scam!"
She (the Doctor): in hiding He (her brother): in prison |
Money the way it ought to be (See above about books also) |
How To Bust A Bunker
Conrad was inspired to look up an artefact as mentioned by James Holland on the podcast "We Have Ways -", said artefact being the Valentin U-Boat Bunker, which he described as being superlatively large, very large indeed, and big with it. Art?
With puny human houses for scale |
The interior |
"Hello!" said the Grand Slam. |
Valentin Bunker: 0 RAF: 1
Of course, this was the thin part of the roof - |
* Said the blogger who posts solely in the electronic ether.
** That's raw creativity at work for you
*** Do you see wh - O you do.
** That's raw creativity at work for you
*** Do you see wh - O you do.
No comments:
Post a Comment