Ha! You were expecting this to be a ranting screed about the utterly dismal weather here in the Allotment of Eden, weren't you?
You can't live in this country and not notice how dismal the weather can be, which is a great ice-breaker at parties, though it can get a bit wearisome (unless you're clever and witty and inventive like Conrad). However, the bad weather I'm talking about comes in the shape of -
For Lo! We are back to "The Guns Of War" by George Blackburn, and the later stages of the campaign in Normandy. After the ferocious, attritional slogging from Eterville onwards ends in the huge Teuton defeat at Falaise, his 4th Field Regiment proceeds in fits and starts towards Belgium and Holland. Along the way there are various fortified garrisoned towns held by the Teutons that have to be taken or otherwise neutralised. Art?
Case in point - Boulogne |
Boulogne defensive coastal artillery |
On that same subject, there were 328 Allied artillery pieces firing on targets in concentrations, to be backed up by 3,000 tons of bombs from RAF's Bomber Command (who probably had to have their arms twisted to provide tactical support like this, instead of bombing Germany flat).
Nor is that all. Art?
Meet "Winnie", here being visited by some Canadian MPs |
Unsurprisingly, it was a short siege. The assault went on September 16 in and in six days the whole business was over, with just over 600 Canuckistanian casualties. And that Fuhrerbefehl of "Die! Die! Die fighting!"? More honoured in the breach - 9,500 prisoners went into POW cages.
Phew! High-intensity modern warfare of the kind that we have not seen since, and thankfully so. David French put it well when he said that the British (and therefore the Commonwealth, so the British Americans, too) " - decided that they would be soldiers, not warriors."
An excellent analysis |
Dog Buns, I still cannot remember what that gaping plot hole is, in a film we were chattering about at work. I didn't write it down, so it vanished into my mental ether. All I remember is that I knew there was a plot hole. This is SO annoying!
Retro-Metabolism
No, sorry, that's the thing that the Mysterons do, isn't it? When they kill someone, which I think amounts to Destructive Testing, since only afterwards can they recreate that person perfectly. There is also the somewhat blurry case of Captain Black. Art?
Captain Black: to port - before being taken over; to starboard - after |
There is considerable debate amongst afficionadoes of futurologist Anderson's depiction of Black; he was never killed, and so is not one of the Mysteron moulage duplicates. Is he, then, a human being under the control of the Mysterons, who would revert to his normal self if their control is neutralised? Or - not? And, is he conscious of his acts under Mysteron control? Because if he is, then if that control is removed, would he have a mental breakdown at what he's been made to do? Once free of said control, could he be prosecuted for mass murder?
What an AMAZING COINCIDENCE that the baddie just so happens to wear and be called "Black" |
Like this monster |
Retro-Tech
Sorry about the long tangential detour. This is what I meant, because on several websites that I frequent a particular image has been going the rounds. If Art can stop sucking the insides out of that nuclear fuel rod and do his job -
Presto |
Anyway, the thing that I wanted to bring your attention to was the design of this beast, since the first thing I thought of on first viewing was a hearken back to the days of the distant Fifties, and Dan Dare. Art?
A brace of space (ships) |
No comments:
Post a Comment