If I'd put "High-Flying Elephants" you might have thought I was merely being silly.*
I might have titled this post "Eight Miles High" except I'm not familiar with the upper bounds of a 747's operational ceiling when carrying cargo.
Apt, though. |
For yes! We are back to Conrad banging on about why concert tickets cost so much. A word of caution, however, as this is less investigative journalism and more a citric rant, which is less objective than the former but a whole lot more fun to write.
The Beeb's article on this had some tour manager boasting about requiring 5 Jumbo jets to carry Beyong's tour paraphernalia from South Canada to the Garden of Eden. You can tell where this sent my tedious, nerdy, number-crunching mind.
"How much does it cost to charter a 747?" pondered your humble scribe. The answer is, a lot. $25,000 per hour for a cargo plane.
Doing a bit of quick and dirty maths, assuming that it takes about hours 10 hour to fly across the Atlantic, the costs of hiring these jets comes to nearly a million dollars. Which, of course, gets passed on to the
This much money! |
Okay, time to put a bucket over the motley's head and hit it with a hammer!**
Conrad Continues With His
Yes, we are back to my forensic analysis of Wikipedia's account of the Battle of Medenine, and the supposed losses experienced by the British, as detailed by the Axis. Go back to yesterday if you need the background. So!
“16 scout cars” sounds
like another fib, too. The reason being
that these handy little vehicles, known as the Daimler Dingo, were used by Perfidious Albion for
reconnaissance, probing ahead of any advancing force, spying on the enemy and
reporting back. However, Medenine was a
defensive engagement for the British, and they had to reason to have a screen
of Dingos out in front of them. Bad
Axis! Naughty Axis!
<sigh> Art strikes again |
“33 motor
vehicles” is dubious, too.
The reason being, as mentioned above, that the British were already on
the defensive, all dug in and treacherously waiting.*** They weren’t driving forward and since they
were defending fixed positions, the MT would all have been collected to the
rear. It’s possible that there were
individual vehicles knocking around the front lines, but certainly nowhere near
enough for 33 of them to be destroyed.
Restraining a wild truck as it tries to escape domestication |
“ 32 anti-tank and anti-aircraft guns” again this sounds like an
exaggeration, because this would amount to nearly 10% of the total number of
guns the British deployed. It’s not mentioned at all in the British
accounts of the battle. And, how would
the Axis know how many anti-aircraft guns were destroyed, as these would be set
out well behind the front line?
Enough of this wibble! Perhaps you begin to see why Conrad is questioning figures and possible sources. I suppose the only way to definitively answer the question of what losses there were is find a book that deals with the battle in detail - and there aren't many - or individual unit records.
However, I see you eyes beginning to glaze over. Let us make haste away!
So far there has been no critical fallout from my doggerel rhyme about Edna - hey, did you see what - O you do - which either means that it was acceptable in the eyes of Wonder Wifey, or that she just hasn't read it yet. Ah - a series of whimpers from our furry daughter over on the windowsill as she catches my eye. Let me just run it through the Dog Translation Unit that I have on loan from DARPA.^
"Wicked neglectful humans. Edna sad. Nobody love Edna. Nobody walk Edna. Nobody play with Edna. Edna have much to offer world. Poor, sad Edna. Neglectful wicked humans - "
"Hey, Edna, want to go walkies?"
"EDNA LOVE EVERYBODY!"
I shall now go suit action to words. Expect me back later, chilled.
* As if that ever happens around here.
** The bucket, not the motley. Also, plastic bucket, rubber hammer.
*** Treacherously, even - dare we say it - perfidiously.
^ Oh alright, I stole it. There. Happy now?
Preparing to rock someone's world. And not in a good way. |
However, I see you eyes beginning to glaze over. Let us make haste away!
So far there has been no critical fallout from my doggerel rhyme about Edna - hey, did you see what - O you do - which either means that it was acceptable in the eyes of Wonder Wifey, or that she just hasn't read it yet. Ah - a series of whimpers from our furry daughter over on the windowsill as she catches my eye. Let me just run it through the Dog Translation Unit that I have on loan from DARPA.^
Edna, taking her ease. On MY bed. |
"Hey, Edna, want to go walkies?"
"EDNA LOVE EVERYBODY!"
I shall now go suit action to words. Expect me back later, chilled.
* As if that ever happens around here.
** The bucket, not the motley. Also, plastic bucket, rubber hammer.
*** Treacherously, even - dare we say it - perfidiously.
^ Oh alright, I stole it. There. Happy now?
No comments:
Post a Comment